This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindirection
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindirection
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:38:04 GMT
- References: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F4F0382@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> and I'd still like the attribute to reflect what it means,
But almost no one has made this objection (on this list) about
the existing extension-element-prefixes attribute (prior to the current
thread). This has identical usage, you refer to a namespace by a
currently bound prefix. Why object to the usage on xsl:script?
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list