This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:44:07 -0000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Joshua Allen
> As someone who's invested quite a bit of energy running around giving
> developers talks on "writing portable XSLT", I will agree that even
> XSLT 1.0 is not guaranteed to be portable. But most developers who
> I've talked to are surprised that "portable XSLT" is actually
> different from "XSLT 1.0". So I hope we haven't given up on portable
> XSLT - sure there are warts, but this is version 1.0 right? Surely
> nobody is suggesting that, since portability is not guaranteed
> in 1.0, we should just forget about it altogether? Users really
> do care about portability, and I hope I haven't been wasting my time
> encouraging them..
I'd hope not too Joshua.
If your papers are not copyright, I'd love to see them on the web?
Regards DaveP
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list