This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: Scott_Boag at lotus dot com
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:36:06 -0500
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com> wrote:
> does this mean you would favour XSLT extensions in XSLT
>(<saxon:function> style)
I don't know of anyone who's against this. It's a matter of getting the
design right... there are complications when you get into the details. I
would rather see this laid on top of XSLT 2.0, since I think there are type
system ramifications.
I wrote:
> designs for things like the document() function
Sorry, I meant the document element, i.e. multiple output docs. Duh.
-scott
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list