This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon
- From: "Nanto, Dan" <dnanto at solant dot com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:22:07 -0700
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
We have been evaluating both Saxon and Xalan, and have not seen much of a
performance difference. We are currently planning on using xalan. Did you
see a large performance difference between the two? Were you using this at
run time of from the command line? Any input would be greatly appreciated!
-Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Messineo, Chris [mailto:CMessineo@caiso.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:22 AM
To: 'xsl-list@mulberrytech.com'
Subject: RE: switching from xalan (J) to saxon
I made the change from Xalan to Saxon, and did not have to change any of my
xslt pages.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Herschke [mailto:robert@herschke.de]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 2:21 AM
To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
Subject: switching from xalan (J) to saxon
Hello everybody,
For performance reasons we will switch our renderer from xalan to saxon
soon.
Perhaps somebody has done this too.
My questions:
- are there some tables or lists of xsl-constructs that doesn't match in
this two processors ?
- are there known issues, like "Do not use this in saxon, as you do it in
xalan"?
- does anybody know something about conversions between XSL-files written
for Xalan to XSL-Files converted for Saxon?
--- or are there 100% compatibility between the constructs in XSL-files?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Robert
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list