Re: A new twist on attributes vs elements

["Terris" <terris at terris dot org>]

I agree with you about prefering attributes
but I ran into the case where
column names don't follow xml-names.  For
example depending on the vendor the names
can contain spaces.

Which means you can't use column names
as element names either.

Major bummer...

This is what I had to settle with...

<column name='foo'>data</column>

You could put the data in an attribute
as you like....

Furthermore if a column value is null how
would you represent that with attributes.

e.g.

<column name='foo' xsd:isnull='true'/>

I'm not sure if the XSD spec supports null
attribute values.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Melvyn Rosengarden" <melrose@rochester.rr.com>
To: <xsl-list@mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 4:28 PM
Subject: A new twist on attributes vs elements


> I have seen a great deal of discussion recently about converting return
sets
> from SQL ( cursors, recorsets, datawindows) into XML strings. All of the
> examples extract the column names of the return set and create XML with
> them. While this method is probably more efficient for storing and
> retrieving XML data in a relational database it is inferior when it comes
to
> navigating the DOM.  I would much prefer to work with attributes (when
they
> make sense) than a myriad of embeded elememts. Has anyone else recognized
> this as an issue and if so how did you resolve it...TIA
>
>
> "You already have zero privacy -- get over it !!
> Melvyn Rosengarden
> melrose@rochester.rr.com
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list