This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: topological sort
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: topological sort
- From: "Peter B. West" <pbwest at powerup dot com dot au>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 13:46:18 +0000
- Organization: Dis
- References: <3A086D4C.CB0E23D0@powerup.com.au> <3A097568.150B9037@powerup.com.au>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
"Peter B. West" wrote:
>
> The question is, what happens when all of the elements have type/ref, or
> when none of the elements which have type/ref refer to any elements
> which do not? How do any of the elements with type/ref get themselves
> processed? I may have missed something here.
I did miss something, of course. That would be a circular set of
references, and the processing would terminate without output, as it
should.
This list is a great tutorial, and posts like Joerg's are teach a lot
about XSL. I had no idea that XPath expressions could be used so freely
in predicates, for example, even though that is implicit in the spec.
I'm grateful also for David's simplification of the conditions involving
count().
Peter
--
Peter B. West pbwest@powerup.com.au http://powerup.com.au/~pbwest
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list