This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: more on XSLT processor performance
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: more on XSLT processor performance
- From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:45:29 +0100 (BST)
- References: <C1DD8B5BC729D311A68D00A0C9EA8BF801315986@mail>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Matthew Bentley writes:
> >For my type of work, in my computer setup, Saxon wins pretty
> >easily. Others will have different criteria to choose from what is
> >really a very rich field of contenders.
>
> I agree. Saxon, at the current point in time, seems to be the winner.
> However, I'd like to see more compiled XSLT processors than Java ones.
> 5.5 hours to process a 69 MB file is not practical -
what does that have to do with compiled? seriously. when the Java one
gets into memory, do you really see a huge difference in the kind of
work an XSLT processor does? ie string processing and walking tree
structures in memory.
sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list