This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT engine performance
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: XSLT engine performance
- From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:53:42 +0100 (BST)
- References: <8BD71A154EA6D211873E00105A125CDF39B980@TSSMX1>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Dylan Walsh writes:
> It would be interesting to see Suns XSLT compiler (a.k.a "translets")
> included. I have used it, and am impressed. It is easier to use and more
> compliant than I had expected (it is still a "technology preview") and,
> subjectively, seems very fast.
if anyone wants to try my silly test, its at
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/xsltest2.zip (cem.xml and ex10.xsl). the
style sheet is trivial - it does a for-each select='top level
element' (about 2500 of them), and then an apply-templates which generates
some simplistic styling. The only interest is that it gives a
decent-sized tree for a processor to chew on, and run over.
Sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list