This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5 (Namespaces etc)
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5 (Namespaces etc)
- From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson at polaris dot net>
- Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 11:24:42 -0500
- References: <200003311927.MAA61084@skew.org><38E5BCFB.265A@es.co.nz><200004011420.OAA24860@nag.co.uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
At 01:08 AM 04/02/2000 +1200, Dan Morrison wrote:
>... does this attitude mean that there can
>never be an XSL 2.0? XML has a version, but that may move faster or
>slower than the changes that will be made to XSL.
I suspect that's probably the reason why the current spec requires a
version="1.0" attribute to a conformant xsl:stylesheet element, as well as
the xmlns declarations.
================================================================
John E. Simpson | "I was gratified to be able to answer
http://www.flixml.org | promptly. I said I don't know."
simpson@polaris.net | (Mark Twain)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list