This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
- To: <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
- From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind at netfolder dot com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:41:45 -0500
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
HI Jonathan,
Jonathan said:
I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what
productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl. Obviously we all need
the fastest method, yet one that follows standards. Please advise
(the silent mediator)
Didier replies:
Exactly. If you can implement an XSLT engine that is very fast, can handle a
lot of transaction per second on the server side, which is compliant to the
latest recommendations and which also allows the usage of JavaScript
(EcmaScript) function to produce a) text result, b) node list. You clearly
have a winner - and me as your first custommer.
Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@netfolder.com
Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com)
XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list