This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug runtime/19644] New: linux 4.5-rc4 commit 8244062ef1


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19644

            Bug ID: 19644
           Summary: linux 4.5-rc4 commit 8244062ef1
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dsmith at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Linux kernel commit 8244062ef1 removes the 'symtab' member of 'struct module',
causing errors like this on rawhide kernel 4.5.0-0.rc3.git3.1.fc24.x86_64:

====
/usr/local/share/systemtap/runtime/transport/symbols.c:252:44: error: 'struct
module' has no member named 'symtab'; did you mean 'syms'?
    if (attr->address == (unsigned long) mod->symtab)
====

Here's the commit:

====
commit 8244062ef1e54502ef55f54cced659913f244c3e
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:   Wed Feb 3 16:55:26 2016 +1030

    modules: fix longstanding /proc/kallsyms vs module insertion race.

    For CONFIG_KALLSYMS, we keep two symbol tables and two string tables.
    There's one full copy, marked SHF_ALLOC and laid out at the end of the
    module's init section.  There's also a cut-down version that only
    contains core symbols and strings, and lives in the module's core
    section.

    After module init (and before we free the module memory), we switch
    the mod->symtab, mod->num_symtab and mod->strtab to point to the core
    versions.  We do this under the module_mutex.

    However, kallsyms doesn't take the module_mutex: it uses
    preempt_disable() and rcu tricks to walk through the modules, because
    it's used in the oops path.  It's also used in /proc/kallsyms.
    There's nothing atomic about the change of these variables, so we can
    get the old (larger!) num_symtab and the new symtab pointer; in fact
    this is what I saw when trying to reproduce.

    By grouping these variables together, we can use a
    carefully-dereferenced pointer to ensure we always get one or the
    other (the free of the module init section is already done in an RCU
    callback, so that's safe).  We allocate the init one at the end of the
    module init section, and keep the core one inside the struct module
    itself (it could also have been allocated at the end of the module
    core, but that's probably overkill).
====

The runtime will need to be updated to handle this change.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]