Re: setjmp test case

[Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>]

> This comes from the runtime/uprobes/Makefile. It would appear that your 
> test case required the building of uprobes.ko. You may have seen 
> discussion about why we sign this module and that is why the certificate 
> is generated.

I see.  I was surprised when I got it again on every run.
It seemed like it would be cached after the first one.
But perhaps it's stored someplace that the testsuite wipes out,
which is probably the right thing for it to do all things considered.

> Perhaps I should make these options run silently, except for errors.

Probably.  Or at least the testsuite infrastructure should do something to
suppress them.  I still find it slightly suspect that all this certificate
nonsense happens when I'm never even going to consider using the server.


Thanks,
Roland