This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2.6.37-rc5-tip 8/20] 8: uprobes: mmap and fork hooks.
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis dot org>
- To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead dot org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte dot hu>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at infradead dot org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation dot org>, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth at in dot ibm dot com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead dot org>, Masami Hiramatsu <masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg at redhat dot com>, LKML <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, SystemTap <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>, Jim Keniston <jkenisto at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec at gmail dot com>, Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation dot org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:57:57 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2.6.37-rc5-tip 8/20] 8: uprobes: mmap and fork hooks.
- References: <20101216095714.23751.52601.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <20101216095848.23751.73144.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6> <1295957741.28776.719.camel@laptop> <1295985926.10144.61.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110126090643.GI19725@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1296147837.10144.79.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110128045353.GU19725@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:23 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Here is the extract from the original patch at
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/16/74 that I sent to LKML and I dont see
> p being uninitialized.
I very much apologize. Seems that Evolution was playing tricks on me.
http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/evolution-wtf.png
That's a screen shot of your email in the preview window. Where 'p' is
definitely not initialized. WTF happened to my email?
But all the replies to that email does not have it initialized either ??
I was not the only one affected by this.
-- Steve