This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: uprobes and empty functions


On 11/03/2010 02:29 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 11/02/2010 02:02 PM, Jim Keniston wrote:
>> Thanks.  The only problem I see is that if setup_uprobe_post_ssout()
>> rejects the instruction, you need to report that via printk().
> 
> OK, I added a printk report, ported it to uprobes "1", and pushed it out
> as commit 33d60a8.  Let's hope I didn't break the world...

Forgot the other thing I wanted to ask...

uprobes/uprobes_i386.c doesn't have the same check_legacy_prefix() logic
as the other x86 variants, making my new prefix checks somewhat moot
there.  Is there any reason not to add this same prefix-skipping to the
old i386 uprobes?

Josh


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]