This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: uprobes and empty functions
On 11/03/2010 02:29 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 11/02/2010 02:02 PM, Jim Keniston wrote:
>> Thanks. The only problem I see is that if setup_uprobe_post_ssout()
>> rejects the instruction, you need to report that via printk().
>
> OK, I added a printk report, ported it to uprobes "1", and pushed it out
> as commit 33d60a8. Let's hope I didn't break the world...
Forgot the other thing I wanted to ask...
uprobes/uprobes_i386.c doesn't have the same check_legacy_prefix() logic
as the other x86 variants, making my new prefix checks somewhat moot
there. Is there any reason not to add this same prefix-skipping to the
old i386 uprobes?
Josh