This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Srikar, I need some uprobes help. I started working on bz640097 (<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640097>), and hoped it was the same problem I was seeing with the new dtrace_vfork_exec.exp test (which I believe I've just fixed in uprobes2/uprobes.c). Unfortunately, it wasn't the same problem. You can use the reproducer included in that bug, or I've also attached a much smaller test. Here's how to use it: Terminal 1: # stap -v shelly-stressor-simple.stp `which bash` `which zsh` Terminal 2: # zsh -c ls You'll get 'Segmentation fault (core dumped)'. If you run zsh under gdb, you'll get: Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. 0x00007ffff7ffd020 in ?? () That address doesn't look valid at all. The simple reproducer just probes 2 functions in zsh, nohw() and nohwe(). In the source, both of these functions are completely empty, so they end up looking like: 0x0000000000434ec0 <+0>: f3 c3 repz retq Josh helped me look at uprobes2/uprobes_x86.c, and it looks like repz/f3 is in the section with the comment "opcodes we may need to refine support for". It may be time for some refining... If we're following this code correctly, check_legacy_prefix() will cause the repz/f3 to get skipped. Then later in uprobe_post_ssout() there is a fixup for retq/c3, but there is a comment that reads: * We don't bother skipping prefixes here because none of the * instructions that require special treatment (other than * rip-relative instructions, handled above) involve prefixes. Josh believes the fixup is adding correction to the ip, but it shouldn't because a ret already sets an ip away from the ssol area. Do you see what is going wrong here? Thanks for the help. P.S. I took a look at v11 of the new uprobes code, and didn't see anything substantially new in this area, so it is possible the new code has a similar problem. -- David Smith dsmith@redhat.com Red Hat http://www.redhat.com 256.217.0141 (direct) 256.837.0057 (fax)
Attachment:
shelly-stressor-simple.stp
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |