This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Line numbers reported by pp() do not respond to the reality

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Not at all. ?I don't think this represents pilot error. ?Tools like
> systemtap are meant to opeate in the face of optimized, deployed
> applications, not just -O0 -g ones. ?It would be good to fully
> understand the phenomenon here.
>
> To that end, would you be able to share the .i file, and the object
> file in question with and without -O*, along with exact gcc version
> data?
>
>
> - FChE
>

Sorry for the delay. I didn't have time in the past week.

I tried to reproduce the difference, but now I get the same results
with and without optimisation.
I need to do some more research.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]