[Bug translator/9771] Detecting probes classes system wide

["fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com  2009-02-17 15:04 -------
> stap -l and stap -L are great if you know what kind of probes there are and/or
> which processes have markers in them.

We should support globbing on the process parameter (process("/bin/*")....)
to make this easier.

> Ideally stap -l without any arguments would give you the probe classes 

More concretely, -l could work by traversing the match_node tree in addition
or instead of making a -p2 run via a synthetic probe script fragment.  The
latter would still be necessary for wildcards that are *inside* probe point
arguments -- kernel.function("*").  For wildcards outside, traversing the
match_node tree should be fine.  (I would probably avoid allowing '-l' to
have an optional parameter, for compatibility with current parsing.)

The various combinations should be enumerated here for analysis to decide
on the best mechanism.


> For processes and libraries with markers compiled in it makes sense to have a
> system wide registry (directory?) where marker files can be placed

This doesn't sound that practical.  Would process path globbing as above
be sufficient?


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9771

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.