This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers
- From: Karim Yaghmour <karim at opersys dot com>
- To: Martin Bligh <mbligh at google dot com>
- Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte dot hu>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu dot desnoyers at polymtl dot ca>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>, Paul Mundt <lethal at linux-sh dot org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, Jes Sorensen <jes at sgi dot com>, Andrew Morton <akpm at osdl dot org>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi at us dot ibm dot com>, Richard J Moore <richardj_moore at uk dot ibm dot com>, Michel Dagenais <michel dot dagenais at polymtl dot ca>, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead dot org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at suse dot de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix dot de>, William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com>, ltt-dev at shafik dot org, systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com, Alan Cox <alan at lxorguk dot ukuu dot org dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:29:46 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers
- Organization: Opersys inc.
- References: <20060918234502.GA197@Krystal> <20060919081124.GA30394@elte.hu> <451008AC.6030006@google.com> <45101965.3050509@opersys.com> <45101809.5030906@google.com>
- Reply-to: karim at opersys dot com
Martin Bligh wrote:
> That was always the intent, or codebase + flat patch if really
> necessary. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Ah, ok.
> Not sure we need scripts, just a normal patch diff would do. I'm not
> sure any of this alters the markup debate much ...
It doesn't, just wasn't clear on the function duplication part.
> it just would seem
> to provide a simpler, faster, and more flexible way of hooking in than
> kprobes.
Sure.
Karim