This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: test case bin3 failed in my x86_64 box

From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Martin Hunt <hunt at redhat dot com>
Cc: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 27 Apr 2006 15:28:45 -0400
Subject: Re: test case bin3 failed in my x86_64 box
References: <445034DF.5000700@linux.intel.com> <1146156903.2671.24.camel@dragon>

> > Test cases bin3, bin4, bin5 failed in my x86_64/IA64 box, from the 
> > error message, it seems that it is word endian problem.
> 
> This was some fallout from the optimization being done for 2427. I have
> fixed the problem.

Sorry about that, if I broke that.

Anyway, having explicit endian-conversion functions like those doesn't
make much sense to me.  Endianness is really an external
representation (serialization) issue only, which would be naturally
expressed as modified formatting options for binary printf.

- FChE

Follow-Ups:
- Re: test case bin3 failed in my x86_64 box
  - From: Martin Hunt

References:
- test case bin3 failed in my x86_64 box
  - From: bibo mao
- Re: test case bin3 failed in my x86_64 box
  - From: Martin Hunt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]