This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Recent test results


Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:
Martin,
	Can you mail your fix so I can verify the same on my Ia64 box.

It is already checked into the cvs, so you should be able to do an "cvs update -d -P" to get it.


-Will


-thanks,
Anil



-----Original Message-----
From: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:systemtap-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Martin Hunt
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 12:36 PM
To: William Cohen
Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Recent test results


On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:35 -0500, William Cohen wrote:

Tried out testing a current snapshot of systemtap (20051111) on some
systems.

[...]


Looking into why some of the x86_64 tests start failing when all are
run. It looks like it is failing in the same way as the ia64 tests
that Anil ran earlier in the week; things go wrong with simple.exp.
Also noticed that x86_64 version failed to report the systemtap
version.

I got the same results as you.


I'm certainly not an expect expert, but a quick look at stap_run.exp
shows a major flaw. I made a quick fix and now I get:

Running ./systemtap.samples/syscalls2.exp ...
Running ./systemtap.samples/sysopen.exp ...
Running ./systemtap.samples/transport.exp ...

=== systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes 107

kernel version: 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp
systemtap translator version: version 0.4.2 built 2005-11-11






Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]