This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Fwd: R.F.C. Should we abandon User-land probes?


oops meant that to go to the mailing list as well

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James Dickens <jamesd.wi@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 20, 2005 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: R.F.C. Should we abandon User-land probes?
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>




On 10/20/05, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com> wrote:
>  Hi -
>
> > No I want to access components of complex structures that are pasted
> > to user land functions. [...]
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=905

 yes those work fine in kernel code, since variables to access
components of the structs/unions are allready availible for the
systemtap code and tapsets, but that is not the case of userland,
especially in the case of C++ classes/struct. So the user required to
enable guru-mode.

 perhaps, you can enable  guru-mode for including structs, but this of
course can polute the namespace.

 James


> - FChE
>
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]