On 2016-03-23 13:43, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 3/23/2016 12:45 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-03-23 12:38, Joel Sherrill wrote:
--- a/newlib/libc/include/stdlib.h
+++ b/newlib/libc/include/stdlib.h
@@ -226,6 +226,12 @@ unsigned short *
_VOID _EXFUN(srand48,(long));
_VOID _EXFUN(_srand48_r,(struct _reent *, long));
#endif /* __SVID_VISIBLE || __XSI_VISIBLE */
+#if __SVID_VISIBLE || __XSI_VISIBLE >= 4 || __BSD_VISIBLE
Please review my previous comment on this.
Is this the desired guard?
#if __MISC_VISIBLE || __XSI_VISIBLE >= 500
MISC is right, but based on Craig's comment, it should be:
#if __MISC_VISIBLE || __XSI_VISIBLE >= 4
+ANSI_SYNOPSIS
+ #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ long int random(void);
+ void srandom(unsigned int <[seed]>);
This doesn't match the header guard, nor does it account for the
multiple options.
So how is the || documented in this format?
That hasn't been determined yet, but what about e.g.:
/* See PORTABILITY for feature test macros */
#include <stdlib.h>
long int random(void);
void srandom(unsigned int <[seed]>);
Then mention the possibilities in PORTABILITY?