This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: [PATCH] Update newlib so that it passes libc++'s tests
- From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>
- To: JF Bastien <jfb at chromium dot org>
- Cc: Craig Howland <howland at lgsinnovations dot com>, newlib at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:21:17 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update newlib so that it passes libc++'s tests
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABdywOcnSpU=r5NGDDzhea4gxALh8LRL4A9vRY31wFjLhtF5zA at mail dot gmail dot com> <52B220A8 dot 4010901 at LGSInnovations dot com> <CABdywOcPo-_RSjBiWeZNeMaB5Aih23OT7u3qXL896NfcqEu6bg at mail dot gmail dot com> <156240854 dot 42718969 dot 1387564988624 dot JavaMail dot root at redhat dot com> <52B498C3 dot 8000108 at LGSInnovations dot com> <CABdywOd7G0W2b2j1WZBZQDJbBk6z_xBpQXXhW4Gahp+Yasq8fQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <1293058429 dot 42755827 dot 1387571108869 dot JavaMail dot root at redhat dot com> <CABdywOdOM0RQmYXvFANs9Bi5q6z7OUJeeO9q=Nux7q_f9mrxhQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "JF Bastien" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: "Jeff Johnston" <email@example.com>
> Cc: "Craig Howland" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 3:36:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update newlib so that it passes libc++'s tests
> > As mentioned, if the libc++ test passes with an incremental fix, then I am
> > fine
> > with it. If it does not fix the libc++ test, then there is no impetus to
> > get a
> > partial fix in now and we can figure out a more correct solution.
> > So, can you put together a patch that fixes the libc++ test, does not touch
> > stdint.h and is incrementally better for wchar.h?
> I'm currently traveling so testing things isn't as easy as it should be.
> IIRC the relevant test is test/depr/depr.c.headers/stdint_h.pass.cpp:
> // WCHAR_MIN
> assert(WCHAR_MIN == std::numeric_limits<wchar_t>::min());
> // WCHAR_MAX
> assert(WCHAR_MAX == std::numeric_limits<wchar_t>::max());
> Many other tests from libc++'s test suite will pass with an
> incremental fix, so it could still be a viable option, but I think
> this particular test won't pass.
Ok. I will delay the snapshot until you resubmit the patch. It passes additional
tests from libc++ so it is a step forward and we might as well make it part of the
I assume you will have this done by Monday.
-- Jeff J.