This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> -----Original Message----- > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib- > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 1:41 AM > To: newlib@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: [Patch, Newlib/Libm] Avoid index.html and Index.html file name > clash on platform like windows > > I think it is fine in libc and libm should probably do the same. The Index > chapter in libc should not be a numbered chapter. The node refers to it > properly. > > From the texinfo documentation on @unnumbered/@appendix: > > "Use the @unnumbered command to start a chapter-level element that > appears without chapter numbers of any kind. Use the @appendix command > to start an appendix that is labeled by letter (âAâ, âBâ, â) instead of by number; > appendices are also at the chapter level of structuring." > > "Write an @appendix or @unnumbered command at the beginning of a line > and follow it on the same line by the title, just as with @chapter. > > -- Jeff J. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen@redhat.com> > To: newlib@sourceware.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 7:53:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Patch, Newlib/Libm] Avoid index.html and Index.html file name > clash on platform like windows > > On Nov 6 11:05, Terry Guo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > When I copy Newlib built on Ubuntu to my Windows machine which is case > > insensitive, I ran into this filename clash issue. I checked some other GNU > > projects like Binutils and found they already rename the node Index to > > something else like "AS Index". This patch intends to solve same issue using > > same approach by rename Index to "Libm Index". Tested and it works. Is it > > ok? > > I think so, but I'm not a texinfo expert. I noticed that the > equivalent lines in libc/libc.texinfo are: > > * Library Index:: > > [...] > > @node Library Index > @unnumbered Index > > Note the "Index" in the unnumbered directive. Is that a bug in > libc/libc.texinfo, or should libm/libm.texinfo do the same? > > > Thanks, > Corinna Thank you guys for your comments. I now updated the patch and rerun the test. No problem found. Is it OK now? BR, Terry 2013-11-07 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com> * libm/libm.texinfo: Rename node Index to Library Index.
Attachment:
rename-libm-Index-html-v2.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |