This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: CodeSourcery's licensing of newlib files
- From: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>
- To: newlib at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:43:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: CodeSourcery's licensing of newlib files
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52002514-06af832aa02dd5da957c6e7accaca7d4 at pmq1v dot m5r2 dot onet> <CADtm3G7S6Pjch8BQ+P8THt+8kfFX30xeswR6NT2CjifegVWwqg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 10/23/2013 10:09 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
Correct, but it means their changes can not be applied to
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:03 AM, freddie_chopin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Currently I have an opportunity to work with CodeSourcery's ARM toolchains in the "full" (paid) version. The thing that caught my eye is the strange license of the header files, that are - of course - newlib files...
/* This file is part of the CodeSourcery C Library (CSLIBC).
Copyright (c) 2009 CodeSourcery, Inc.
THIS FILE CONTAINS PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND TRADE SECRET
INFORMATION OF CODESOURCERY AND/OR ITS LICENSORS.
and so on... Can they attach sth like that to newlib's files?
Yes, that's permitted under the BSD license.