This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: CodeSourcery's licensing of newlib files
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
- To: Gregory Fong <gregory dot 0xf0 at gmail dot com>, freddie_chopin <freddie_chopin at op dot pl>
- Cc: "newlib at sourceware dot org" <newlib at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:13:11 -0500
- Subject: Re: CodeSourcery's licensing of newlib files
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52002514-06af832aa02dd5da957c6e7accaca7d4 at pmq1v dot m5r2 dot onet> <CADtm3G7S6Pjch8BQ+P8THt+8kfFX30xeswR6NT2CjifegVWwqg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 10/23/2013 3:09 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:03 AM, freddie_chopin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Currently I have an opportunity to work with CodeSourcery's ARM toolchains in the "full" (paid) version. The thing that caught my eye is the strange license of the header files, that are - of course - newlib files...
>> /* This file is part of the CodeSourcery C Library (CSLIBC).
>> Copyright (c) 2009 CodeSourcery, Inc.
>> THIS FILE CONTAINS PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND TRADE SECRET
>> INFORMATION OF CODESOURCERY AND/OR ITS LICENSORS.
>> and so on... Can they attach sth like that to newlib's files?
> Yes, that's permitted under the BSD license.
Not all code in newlib is BSD licensed but the others likely allow it
Permitted doesn't make it cool or nice.
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985