This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: [PATCH] Disable thread cancellation support for RTEMS
- From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat dot com>
- To: newlib at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:39:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable thread cancellation support for RTEMS
- References: <1363963621-14546-1-git-send-email-sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de> <20130322150945 dot GB21637 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <514C7F19 dot 3090708 at embedded-brains dot de>
- Reply-to: newlib at sourceware dot org
On Mar 22 16:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 04:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 22 15:47, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>Use a define to manage the stdio thread cancellation support. Disable
> >>the thread cancellation support for RTEMS. In RTEMS the availability of
> >>POSIX threads is optional and depends on a configuration option. To
> >>support all RTEMS configurations we have to drop the thread cancellation
> >>support. A long term solution has to be developed in RTEMS to deal with
> >>this. Once this is done, we can enable the support in Newlib again.
> >Wouldn't it be much cleaner code-wise to override the pthread_setcancelstate
> >function with an RTEMS-specific dummy if cancellation is not supported?
> This could be an option. Makes the usage of pthread_setcancelstate
> sense if no locks are used?
No, right. I had another look into your patch and it looks ok.
Feel free to check in.