This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: [PATCH 64bit] ssize_t
On 02/20/2013 06:40 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
GCC requires exact symmetry of types between ssize_t and size_t.
GCC does not know or care about ssize_t; it's not an ISO C type. POSIX,
which defines ssize_t, does not require it to be the signed type
corresponding to size_t.
Fact is, I've encountered them more than once and recall me having
reported such issues several times at several places.
I don't have one at hand right now, but I guess I can google for them.