crt0 formalization

Jeff Johnston jjohnstn@redhat.com
Tue Dec 5 14:13:00 GMT 2006


It's for the spu.  I am guessing that Joel also got an error message 
regarding the patch size so it never got posted to the newlib msg list, 
though it made it to my inbox.

I have tar'd up the patch and attached to this message.

-- Jeff J.

Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> <resent due to sources.redhat.com rejecting my original reply message 
>> due to the fact it included the original patch and thereby exceeded a 
>> size constraint>
>>
>> Is it fair to say no one has objections to this patch?  I will check 
>> it in later today unless I hear otherwise.
>>
> I don't remember seeing this patch and I don't see any email from 
> jschopp or a message with
> "formalization" in the subject in the newlib mailing list archives for 
> the past few months .
> It may be fine but I don't think it has been seen on the newlib list.
> 
> Which platform is the crt0 for?
> 
> --joel
>> -- Jeff J.
>>
>> jschopp wrote:
>>> In our recent SDK 2.0 and in patches being submitting for FSF gcc 
>>> there are some changes to crt0.  The attached patch has been 
>>> extensively tested as part of our SDK.  Everything works as 
>>> expected.  The only minor regression is that it pulls in atexit(), 
>>> which in turn pulls in malloc().  This works fine but takes up space, 
>>> which is precious on this platform.  Previous discussions on this 
>>> list have sent some patches with resolve the problem of pulling in 
>>> malloc.
>>>
>>> In my opinion the attached patch should be committed.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: newlib-spu.patches.tar.gz
Type: application/x-tar
Size: 37209 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20061205/52e3cc41/attachment.tar>


More information about the Newlib mailing list