crt0 formalization
Jeff Johnston
jjohnstn@redhat.com
Tue Dec 5 14:13:00 GMT 2006
It's for the spu. I am guessing that Joel also got an error message
regarding the patch size so it never got posted to the newlib msg list,
though it made it to my inbox.
I have tar'd up the patch and attached to this message.
-- Jeff J.
Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> <resent due to sources.redhat.com rejecting my original reply message
>> due to the fact it included the original patch and thereby exceeded a
>> size constraint>
>>
>> Is it fair to say no one has objections to this patch? I will check
>> it in later today unless I hear otherwise.
>>
> I don't remember seeing this patch and I don't see any email from
> jschopp or a message with
> "formalization" in the subject in the newlib mailing list archives for
> the past few months .
> It may be fine but I don't think it has been seen on the newlib list.
>
> Which platform is the crt0 for?
>
> --joel
>> -- Jeff J.
>>
>> jschopp wrote:
>>> In our recent SDK 2.0 and in patches being submitting for FSF gcc
>>> there are some changes to crt0. The attached patch has been
>>> extensively tested as part of our SDK. Everything works as
>>> expected. The only minor regression is that it pulls in atexit(),
>>> which in turn pulls in malloc(). This works fine but takes up space,
>>> which is precious on this platform. Previous discussions on this
>>> list have sent some patches with resolve the problem of pulling in
>>> malloc.
>>>
>>> In my opinion the attached patch should be committed.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: newlib-spu.patches.tar.gz
Type: application/x-tar
Size: 37209 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/attachments/20061205/52e3cc41/attachment.tar>
More information about the Newlib
mailing list