configure
Jeff Johnston
jjohnstn@redhat.com
Mon Mar 20 21:18:00 GMT 2006
Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>I can't comment on the Debian packages, but FWIW: I use aclocal 1.4-p6,
>>automake 1.4-p6, and autoconf 2.13 locally. I run the following in the
>>top-level newlib directory:
>>
>> aclocal -I .
>> autoconf
>> automake --cygnus Makefile
>>
>>This does not result in bringing in a 2.50 prereq.
>>
>>-- Jeff J.
>
>
> At the risk of causing some email thread drift, I was just asking over
> on the GCC and binutils mailing lists about moving from autoconf 2.13 to
> autoconf 2.59. Is anyone looking at making this change for the newlib
> subdirectories?
>
> Does anyone know of any issues that would prevent moving newlib to a
> newer autoconf?
>
I looked at it briefly a while ago and ran into a number of problems due
to the fact that newlib required some macros that were taken away plus
there were a number of other backward compatibility issues. At the time
I didn't see any compelling reason to make the switch.
I have just started relooking at it today. I have gotten through a
number of issues so far. I still have to remove the annoying warnings
about AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS using a literal in the machine/OS-specific
directories. We configure the name of the machine directory and sys
directory once at the top-level. This name corresponds to
subdirectories of lower directories which we conditionally configure
using the names specified above. It used to be nice and simple.
-- Jeff J.
> Steve Ellcey
> sje@cup.hp.com
More information about the Newlib
mailing list