This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the libffi project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: OSX 10.6 libffi updates


I agree the versions are confusing.
My 10.5 systems calls itself:

Darwin jbook2 9.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.8.0: Wed Jul 15 16:55:01 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.15.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386

if that helps.

> Is the darwin equivalent of OSX 10.6 "darwin10.6"?

No, it isn't.
I don't know the formula, just that it isn't what anyone would expect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29
says 10.5 == 9.0, 10.6==10.0, among others.

?- Jay

----------------------------------------
> From: green@redhat.com
> To: twall@users.sf.net
> CC: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: OSX 10.6 libffi updates
> Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 13:42:49 -0400
>
> Timothy Wall  writes:
>> Has anyone applied and tested Apple's libffi changes? python/ctypes has applied them; they're actually required in order to build on ppc-darwin.
>>
>> The patches from python/ctypes isn't a straight application of changes, there has been some file renaming.
>>
>> http://svn.python.org/view?view=rev&revision=74972
>
> I had a quick look at these, and I don't think so.
>
> http://moxielogic.org/wiki/index.php?title=Libffi_3.0.9 shows that it
> was built and tested on powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0.
>
> Is the darwin equivalent of OSX 10.6 "darwin10.6"? I've never really
> followed Apple releases.
>
> It would be nice to get these changes in if we could figure out what OS
> we're really targeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> AG
 		 	   		  


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]