This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the libffi project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:20:31PM +0200, Andreas Tobler wrote:Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:cp -r /usr/obj/ports/libffi-3.0.8/libffi-3.0.8.testsuite/libffi.call/ /usr/obj/ports/libffi-3.0.9rc1/libffi-3.0.9rc1/testsuite/On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:57:30AM -0400, Anthony Green wrote:Here's 3.0.9rc1: ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/libffi/libffi-3.0.9rc1.tar.gz
I built this out of my new git repository here: http://github.com/atgreen/libffi
I'm using stgit, which is like quilt for git. I rebased the git repository to gcc HEAD, then added the "stand-alone" patches (mostly configury changes), the AVR port, the Snow Leopard memory protection fix, and the 64-bit AIX fix.
I believe we're missing ChangeLog entries from Jens, Abdulaziz, and Bradley. Please send them. I'll push your changes into GCC once they're clean.
Abdulaziz - please also check that I applied your patch correctly. The source files had changed somewhat since you submitted it.
I'll set up a wiki page to track platform testing soon, but initial test results and pointers to missing patches would be helpful.
Thanks,
AGAs of this RC, there's an increase of about 340 in failed tests on OpenBSD. I've attached the log. The unwindtest.cc failure is expected, ther others not. Anyone has a clue what's going on here?
libffi 3.0.8: # of expected passes 1365 # of unexpected failures 8 # of unsupported tests 15
libffi 3.0.9rc1 # of expected passes 685 # of unexpected failures 348 # of unsupported tests 15Could you try to copy the testcases from 3.0.8 (maybe even 3.0.7) to 3.0.9rc1 and rerun the testsuite?
I encounter similar failures on FreeBSD sparc64 and amd64. Copying the testcases from an older libffi release to the 3.0.9rc1 brings everthing back in PASS land here. (with gcc-4.2.x) Well, that is not the solution, just a first step to isolate the issue.
In the meantime I try to find out what is going on, I guess MMAP vs. ffi_closure_alloc is the starting point to investigate.
Andreas
Makes them PASS again here too, with gcc3.
I'm short on time this week, if you go first and dive into it, please :)
Np. I'll take care. Thanks for testing. Andreas
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |