This is the mail archive of the libffi-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libffi project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Non-gcc releases

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Heller <theller at python dot net>
Cc: libffi-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 16 Apr 2004 14:31:45 -0600
Subject: Re: Non-gcc releases
References: <87fzbwu39a.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <hdwc8wzv.fsf@python.net><87hdvkvnv8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <ekqoarp6.fsf@python.net>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

Thomas> Hm, IANAL, but I don't think it would be illegal (or immoral)
Thomas> to rip libffi from the gcc cvs, remove the GPL'd files from it
Thomas> (there are some in the testsuite, for example), and upload it
Thomas> to somewhere else, leaving it under the original redhet
Thomas> license.  Am I wrong believing this?

Do we care what license is on the test suite?  I think it is fine as
long as it is redistributable.  It isn't like this code is installed
or really usable outside the project.

Tom

References:
- Non-gcc releases
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Non-gcc releases
  - From: Thomas Heller
- Re: Non-gcc releases
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Non-gcc releases
  - From: Thomas Heller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]