This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- From: "drepper at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 14 Oct 2005 18:05:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale
- References: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-10-14 18:05 -------
I really have no interest to get in the middle of all this. The extension
@classic seems indeed to be wrong to me from what I read. And there is already
a Belarusian locale.
Unless this second language variant is the official one (which I doubt it is) it
is best to just collect a tarball with all the appropriate files and distribute
it separately. There is nothing a separately distribute locale source file
cannot do if it is compiled using localedef upon installation.
Adding variants like this (as opposed to Latin vs Cyrillic, for instance) would
mean we open ourselves to all kind of fights like this.
So, unless I get some really convincing arguments I'll close this as WONTFIX.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |drepper at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.