This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: segfault with pthread_cancel() and PTHREAD_STACK_MIN on armv7

From: Michael Weiser <michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, libc-help at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:17:14 +0100
Subject: Re: segfault with pthread_cancel() and PTHREAD_STACK_MIN on armv7
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20170210192307.GA58790@dinsnail.net> <49302441-ed25-151e-c6aa-4728b84f591c@linaro.org> <650a8f0b-0a24-7466-6317-c4206ba89bca@redhat.com>

Hi Adhemerval and Florian,

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:15:51PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:

> > It will really depend of the stack usage when the signal arrives and also
> > on compiler options and version, but in either way if you intend to handle
> Note that the stack requirements also depend *a lot* on the kernel version
> and CPU features supported.  This is because the kernel pushes all the

Thank you for your detailed answers. Based on your substantiations of my
suspicions I've filed a bug report with ntp
(http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3391) requesting to increase the
thread stack size.
-- 
Thanks,
Michael

References:
- segfault with pthread_cancel() and PTHREAD_STACK_MIN on armv7
  - From: Michael Weiser
- Re: segfault with pthread_cancel() and PTHREAD_STACK_MIN on armv7
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: segfault with pthread_cancel() and PTHREAD_STACK_MIN on armv7
  - From: Florian Weimer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]