This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: TEST_DIRECT flag and nptl eintr/stdio tests


Florian,

What timing! This looks like exactly the issue I was dealing with. I
corrected the problem in a slightly different manner. I will post the
patch tomorrow to see if it's something that you'd like to incorporate
in case there are future tests that use SIGALRM. I don't necessarily
know if my fix is more general or too specific. I will let experts
decide!

Thanks, as ever, for the work that you do and for your response to my message!

Will

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/25/2016 08:23 PM, Will Hawkins wrote:
>
>> Second, I have a question about the interaction between TEST_DIRECT
>> flag and certain tests in nptl. In particular, I am having trouble
>> with eintr* and stdio1. When I run those tests without the TEST_DIRECT
>> flag set, everything seems to run fine. However, when I run those
>> tests with the TEST_DIRECT flag set, they "do not complete".
>>
>> I am testing against 6f9d4f595e4073807ad0e844cbb3b3d7158b76d5 from
>> August 17. I am more than happy to investigate the problem on my own
>> (this is what I love to do) but I wanted to first reach out and see if
>> there was some known problem.
>
>
> Last week, I posted a patch which should fix this:
>
>   <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-08/msg00500.html>
>
> Florian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]