This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 28 Jun 2016 20:01, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/28/2016 07:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 28 Jun 2016 16:12, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> I need a way to detect symbol interposition from within libc. > > > > why ? > > I want to add a hardened variant of getline which uses > malloc_usable_size to check chunk size and specified size for consistency. just getline ? or that's just where you want to start ? > Not all interposed mallocs interpose malloc_usable_size as well, so I > need to check for > > (malloc == __libc_malloc) > == (malloc_usable_size == _libc_malloc_usable_size) > > and only do this if equality holds. > > Another application is initialization for glibc malloc. To reduce the > number of function pointers, I would like to remove the malloc hooks. > But this means that we need to remove lazy initialization of malloc. I > want to add an explicit call into malloc to perform basically what > ptmalloc_init does today, but only if glibc malloc has not been interposed. i guess this kind of tails into the other discussion about how we don't document interposing memory symbols and how today, you can't just replace a single one and have it work. and how sometimes you can get away with just a few, but in reality if you don't do them all, bad things happen. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |