This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: building glibc 2.15


On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:

On Thursday 22 March 2012 17:10:18 Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2012 12:46:01 Allin Cottrell wrote:
Thanks. After I applied the __i686 patch found on the wiki
glibc 2.15 built OK. But I'm seeing a few failures on "make
check" and wondered if they were "expected" or anomalous. The
failed tests are tst-mqueue1, tst-mqueue2, tst-mqueue3,
tst-mqueue4, tst-mqueue7 and check-localplt. I can post the
.out files if that's useful, but for example:

"mq_setattr on invalid mqd_t did not fail with EBADF: \
Function not implemented"

"fct: mq_getattr failed: Function not implemented"

This is on Linux 3.3, gcc 4.7.0.

but what version of kernel headers are you building against ?

The headers are from 3.3. But -- maybe this is the issue -- I followed Linus's suggestion a little while back and built a 64-bit kernel, though the rest of the system is i686. (So when I configured glibc I used --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu.)

Hmm, in this situation is it necessary to configure the
"public" kernel headers as i686? Well, I can google.

the exported kernel headers don't have autoconf style options, and the x86_64/x86 headers are unified, so that shouldn't matter.

Thanks. Given the "check" failures I thought I'd try using slightly more conservative kernel headers -- 3.2.12 instead of 3.3. Now make check gives fewer fails: just tst-mqueue5 and check-localplt. The messages are


tst-mqueue5.out:
SIGRTMIN signal in child did not arrive
child failed with status 256

check-localplt.out:
--- ../scripts/data/localplt-i386-linux-gnu.data 2012-01-01 07:16:32.000000000 -0500
+++ - 2012-03-23 15:26:52.785977398 -0400
@@ -4,4 +4,5 @@
libc.so: malloc
libc.so: memalign
libc.so: realloc
+libm.so: feraiseexcept
libm.so: matherr


Any judgment on whether these are things to worry about?
Thanks.

Allin Cottrell


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]