This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix wrong implementation of \B (BZ #693)

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com, karl at freefriends dot org, arnold at skeeve dot com, drepper at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:05:39 +0100
Subject: Re: Fix wrong implementation of \B (BZ #693)
References: <41F7E937.2060303@gnu.org>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 08:02:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This is pretty easy to do, as all the code is already there to implement
> \b.  Just like \b is lowered to \<|\>, \B is lowered to the disjunction
> of two (otherwise unavailable) constraints, "inside word" and "outside
> word".

Heh, posted similar patch ealier today.  I wonder how bug-regex19.c
could pass for you though, there were several tests in it that
expected (\b|\B) is not the same as nothing.

	Jakub

References:
- Fix wrong implementation of \B (BZ #693)
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]