This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes: > On a completely unrelated note, can somebody tell me what the routines > mentioned in $SUBJECT are for? What are they're supposed to do and > what are they needed for? They are the core of the C99 exp2l and log2l functions, resp. Nobody has yet written generic implementations of them for 80-bit extended float. Currently only x86, m68k and x86-64 specific versions exist, and a 128-bit extended float version of log2l. Search for e_exp2l.* and e_log2l.* in the sysdeps hierarchy for the existing implementations. > I'm asking since on ia64 "make check" keeps failing with: > > __ieee754_exp2l not implemented > __ieee754_log2l not implemented It's not failing because of this. When a math funtion is not implemented it is just skipped by the tests. Actually, all math tests are working fine here. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |