This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: CLOCK_* clockid_t value macros

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:05:04 -0700
Subject: Re: CLOCK_* clockid_t value macros
References: <200210181953.g9IJrQR18599@magilla.sf.frob.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roland McGrath wrote:

> Is there any problem with defining the CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID and
> CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID macros even on the systems that don't support
> them?
> I would like to consolidate the bits/time.h files and this is the only
> actual difference among any of the supported configurations.


In theory it shouldn't be a problem since users have to check
_POSIX_CPUTIME and _POSIX_THREAD_CPUTIME first.  But there is definitely
code out there which will break.  I don't have personally problems with
this.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9sGlw2ijCOnn/RHQRAgk2AJ0V0+mzZx5GRgaOVhxA00amaR5uAgCfUz7t
miCO9JQ1hWNrOJuI5vOxEmw=
=pvYV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- CLOCK_* clockid_t value macros
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]