This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: more testing needed

To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
Subject: Re: more testing needed
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:55:40 +0200
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <m3ae2rg3or.fsf@otr.mynet><20010629111222.A737@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><m3k81vdxwz.fsf@otr.mynet>

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> I think libgcc_s.so.1 vs. GLIBC needs to be resolved, see my mail in
>> `GCC 3.0 and GLIBC don't work together' thread on libc-alpha.
>> I think glibc 2.2.4 should be compilable by GCC 3.0 now when it is released.
> 
> I don't see this as a requirement.  In fact, I have no interest to
> introduce such major changes.

I would like to see this solved in 2.2.4.  

If we do not solve it, we should at least come to a conclusion how to
solve it for later.  Otherwise I fear that this is solved in different
- and totally incompatible - ways by some distributors which leads to
chaos.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

References:
- more testing needed
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: more testing needed
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: more testing needed
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]