This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: --whole-archive libc_nonshared.a in shared objects

To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
Subject: Re: --whole-archive libc_nonshared.a in shared objects
From: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:44:34 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>

> Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes:
> 
> > Why is all of libc_nonshared.a included with --whole-archive into every .so
> > linked?  Shouldn't it come after --no-whole-archive and link in only the
> > modules needed by that .so?
> 
> Yes, this should be changed.  Note that it's not causing any harm
> since the symbols are not exported.  Nevertheless...

But the undefined symbols are there, and possibly creating more version set
dependencies than there need to be.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: --whole-archive libc_nonshared.a in shared objects
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- Re: --whole-archive libc_nonshared.a in shared objects
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]