This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Ressurect __strtou?q_internal

To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ressurect __strtou?q_internal
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:19:37 -0800
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>,Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
References: <20010211215553.R16457@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20010211130810.A12185@valinux.com> <m3itmfaby0.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com>

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:22:31PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes:
> 
> > If it is the case, please don't make them default so that the static
> > linker won't use them. We have the similar problem with res_init. What
> > happaned to my patch:
> > 
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-12/msg00029.html
> 
> I didn't have this in my inbox anymore, must have slipped through.  It
> seems to be reasonable and I applied it.  Thanks,
> 

I think we should do the similar thing for __strtoq_internal and
__strtouq_internal.


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Ressurect __strtou?q_internal
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- [PATCH] Ressurect __strtou?q_internal
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Ressurect __strtou?q_internal
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Ressurect __strtou?q_internal
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]