This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>That's not too much of a problem. The function is always inlined. In >case the extra parameter is not needed it'll be ignored and not even >loaded. > >Only requirement: you provide a patch for all architectures. I had a different idea. Why not passing the pointer to the complete header to the function? This way each architecture can do whatever they want to decide if the program is usable on the machine. I attached a patch, what do you think? blue skies, Martin Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247 E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com (See attached file: elf_header.diff)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |