This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 04:19:28PM -0500, Mark Brown wrote: > > Given that having "one solution for all platforms" does not sound realistic; > and having a libgcc that works well for Linux glibc *is* important -- is there > anything that prevents some glibc person(s) working with the gcc libgcc > maintainer for Linux, to produce a libgcc that meets our needs? Maybe even > produce a spec so that future versions of the libgcc-for-linux will stay > compatible? We can give it another try. > > While libgcc.so may be a per-platform issue, I do not see why we cannot > work with/educate the appropriate gcc maintainer on this; as long as > part of the education includes why we need a libgcc that meets *all* > of the glibc needs. Last time when I tried it, they didn't wany any solution which only works for glibc. They want a solution which works on all targets gcc supports. That is why I said the solution they chose would fall far short for glibc. H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |