This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 10:43:00AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >>>>> Adam J Richter writes: > > Adam, > > please send your comments to libc-alpha@sourceware.cygnus.com - I've > set a CC and Reply-To. The testers of 2.1.91 will most probably not > read your comments on bug-glibc. > > I have overcome the segfaulting problem that I reported > > earlier tonight by installing each of the .so files with convoluted > > shell command. > > > As far as I can tell, the problem was due an incompatibility > > between versions of at least one of the .so files that glibc comprises. > > The problem occured when the new ld-linux.so.2 and libc.so.6 have been > > installed, but the other .so files have not yet been installed. > Can you describe the problem better? What exactly is wrong? What > needs to be fixed in glibc? > What happened to this bug report? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-07/msg00048.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-07/msg00047.html H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |