This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: LINK_MAX undefined

To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Subject: Re: LINK_MAX undefined
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 08 Jun 2000 03:01:57 -0700
Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <u8itvkh6ks.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:

> What shall we do here ?  Uli, it seems you removed LINK_MAX completly
> but it's used in a number of places throughout glibc.  Should
> _POSIX_LINK_MAX used instead?

It should not be used in many places.  Wherever it is used, it's
wrong.  I just checked in a change for pathconf.c.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- LINK_MAX undefined
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]