This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

__const or const?

To: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
Subject: __const or const?
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Date: 31 Dec 1999 15:42:28 +0100


I'm currently cleaning up some more header files in glibc 2.2.  Is it
ok to replace __const by const?  I haven't done this so far but
Thorsten reminded me that we're not consistent.  

I'm going to use const instead of __const for further patches if
nobody objects.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __const or const?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]