This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc 2.0.111


On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Dominik Kubla wrote:

> But the regression tests failed in math/test-fenv... (see attached output)

This is what I saw last week.  I think that the math routines need to do:

if (ptr != NULL)
  if (ptr[0] != '\0') {
  ...
  }

... instead of

if (ptr[0] != '\0') {
  ...
  }

(sorry about the vagueness, the box in question is at home and I won't be
able to see it for another couple of days)

Further, did dependencies get screwed up in 2.0.111?  A make install
rebuilds significant portions of the tree.  I've seen this on three
machines now.

--	Chris (wileyc@sekiya.twics.co.jp)



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]